Views on Expanding Nuclear Energy to Combat Climate Change

As climate change intensifies, some experts argue that nuclear energy, which produces virtually no carbon emissions, should be significantly expanded. They emphasise that nuclear power is more reliable than solar or wind energy for large-scale electricity generation and that modern reactor technology is far safer than in the past. Opponents, however, counter that the risk of disasters like Chernobyl and Fukushima still exists, that the long-term disposal of radioactive waste remains unresolved, and that construction costs and timelines are excessive compared to renewable energy. To what extent do you agree that nuclear energy should be expanded as a key measure to combat climate change?